Libyan International Medical University Journal

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 53--58

Associations between anisometropia and depth of amblyopia in Benghazi, Libya


Sabah Saad Eldressi, Mariam M B. Gebril 
 Department of Ophthalmology, Benghazi University, Benghazi, Libya

Correspondence Address:
Mariam M B. Gebril
Department of Ophthalmology, Benghazi University, Benghazi
Libya

Abstract

Background: Amblyopia is a disorder characterized by a decrease in the best-corrected visual acuity in one or both eyes with no clear structural anomalies or ocular pathology. There are three primary types of amblyopia: anisometropic, strabismic, and sensory deprivation amblyopia. Anisometropic amblyopia occurs in children having a difference in refractive error between the two eyes and occurs in the more ametropic eye. Furthermore, there is a strong association of anisometropia with strabismus. Aim: The study aimed to investigate the association between age, sex, laterality, and type of refractive error on the depth of anisometropic amblyopia. Settings and Design: This was a retrospective (observational) study. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 23.0 software. Materials and Methods: One hundred and nine patient's files with anisometropic amblyopia were investigated, who were followed in a pediatric eye clinic in Sohail Elatrash's eye hospital Benghazi, Libya, between January 2008 and December 2018. Results: There is no effect of the type of gender on the depth amblyopia with P = 0.57. Furthermore, there is no difference in the predominance of amblyopia between the right and left eye (P = 0.93). Age is correlated in a positive manner with the depth of amblyopia (P = 0.035). Conclusions: in our study, eye laterality and gender had no effect on the depth of anisometropic amblyopia. The age and the smallest amount of astigmatism difference between both eyes had a direct proportion on the depth of anisometropic amblyopia.



How to cite this article:
Eldressi SS, B. Gebril MM. Associations between anisometropia and depth of amblyopia in Benghazi, Libya.Libyan Int Med Univ J 2020;5:53-58


How to cite this URL:
Eldressi SS, B. Gebril MM. Associations between anisometropia and depth of amblyopia in Benghazi, Libya. Libyan Int Med Univ J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 23 ];5:53-58
Available from: http://journal.limu.edu.ly/text.asp?2020/5/2/53/306596


Full Text



 Introduction



Amblyopia is a disorder characterized by a decrease in the best-corrected visual acuity in one or both eyes with no clear structural anomalies or ocular pathology.[1]

During the sensitive period, visual development in infancy or early childhood relies on equal and good quality visual images in its anatomical and physiological maturation at both levels, retina and the primary visual cortex result in irreversible defects.[2] Amblyopia is considered the most common cause of monocular visual loss in children, contributing to over 90% of consultations of children to ophthalmologists and orthoptists.[3],[4],[5]

Amblyopia has three primary types: anisometropic, strabismic, and sensory deprivation amblyopia.

Anisometropic amblyopia, which is a common type of amblyopia, occurs in children having a difference in refractive error between the eyes and occurs in the more ametropic eye.[6],[7],[8],[9]

The issue of the persistence of anisometropia in early life is clearly of relevance to the association between anisometropia and amblyopia. It appears to be the only associated abnormality in around one-third of cases of human amblyopia.[10],[11]

Anisometropic amblyopia seems to be discovered at a later age in contrast to other types of amblyopia because of no apparent pathology and thus becomes deeper and may become untreatable also.[3]

We investigated in our study the association between depth of anisometropic amblyopia with age, gender, laterality, type, and amount of refractive error.

 Materials and Methods



A retrospective (observational) records review was conducted on 109 subjects diagnosed with unilateral anisometropic amblyopia, who were followed at a pediatric eye clinic in Sohail Elatrash's Eye Hospital, between January 2008 and December 2018.

These patients were diagnosed and treated by a team of pediatric ophthalmologists and optometrists at the hospital.

All subjects had a comprehensive eye examination including detailed fundus examination, visual acuity test for distance by either picture Snellen chart or the illiterate Snellen chart, cycloplegic refraction, and cover tests for near and distance. Cycloplegic refraction was performed by Auto Kerato-Refractometer (Topcon®KR8000). Full refractive correction was prescribed, and visual acuities were noted at the second visit. Patients were diagnosed with amblyopia if their interocular visual acuity difference 1 and more Snellen lines. Amblyopia was classified mild, moderate, and severe according to both the refraction values and the visual acuities. All individuals had healthy ocular structures with no history of any surgery.

Anisometropia was defined as deference of 1.00 standard deviation (SD) in any meridian between both eyes.

Based on the amount of refractive error, we classified each refractive error as:

Mild (myopia: −0.50 D to <−3 D; hyperopia: +0.50 D to <+3 D; and astigmatism: 0.50 D to < 1 D)Moderate (myopia: −3 D to <6 D; hyperopia: +3 D to <+ 6 D; and astigmatism: 1 D to <2 D)Or severe (myopia: −6 D and over; hyperopia: +6 D and over; and astigmatism: 2 D and over)[12]Amblyopia, in general, was defined as visual acuity of worse than 6/9 Snellen or 0.2 Log MAR in the affected eye.[13]

The severity of amblyopia is often classified according to the visual acuity in the affected eye, using visual acuity testing. “Mild” amblyopia is classified as being visual acuity of 6/9–6/12, “moderate” amblyopia as being worse than 6/12–6/36, and “severe” amblyopia as being worse than 6/36.

Associations between the depth of amblyopia and the age and/or gender of the subjects, the laterality of the amblyopic eyes, the type, and the magnitude of the refractive error of the amblyopic eyes and the magnitude of anisometropia were statistically analyzed.

We used nonparametric tests because our values were nonnormal in distribution: Pearson's Chi-square test, two-sided Spearman's correlation. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software.

 Results



The study included 109 patients' files with unilateral anisometropic amblyopia in the pediatric eye clinic in Sohail Elatrash's Eye Hospital, in Benghazi, Libya.

They were selected and classified according to the inclusion criteria in this study.

General analysis

There were more number of females (58 [53.2%]) than the number of males (51 [46.8%]). The minimal age was 1 year, and the maximum age was 19 years with a mean of 5.34 years and a median of 5.00 and a SD of 3.11 year.

Astigmatism was found to be the most common type of refractive error, comprising 39.4% of the amblyopic eyes, followed by hyperopia in 33.9% of eyes and myopia of 3.6%.

Mild refractive error account of 31.3%, moderate refractive error 43.8%, and severe refractive error 24.9% for all types of refractive error. The spherical equivalent ranging from - 12.50 to + 10.00 SD. Visual acuity with mean of the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR) of 0.5; this before achieving improvement.

Severe amblyopia was found in 15.6%, moderate amblyopia in (20.6%), and the remaining eyes with mild amblyopia.

Analysis of anisometropic amblyopia

There is a strong association with increasing age and the amplitude of amblyopia (P = 0.035) and Mann–Whitney U-test = 607.5.

No effect of type of gender on magnitude nor on the correction of amblyopia in all three types of refractive error with P = 0.57 and P = 0.021, respectively.

[Table 1] shows the deferent grades of anisometropic amblyopia in between genders, which show an increase incidence of severe and moderate amblyopia in males but not with a statistically significant value (P = 0.73).{Table 1}

With treatment, amblyopia in males improved in 29.2% and did not improve in 70.8%, whereas in females, the improvement noted in 57.7% and did not improve in 42.3%. The probability of improvement of amblyopia in female is better than in males who were statistically significant value (P = 0.021 Pearson χ2 = 3.3).

There is no difference between the right and left eyes (P = 0.93, Mann–Whitney U-test = 1391) in the presence of amblyopia, and there is not a statistically significant difference in the depth of amblyopia on either side, as shown in [Table 2].{Table 2}

Analysis of visual acuity correlations among amblyopic eyes in deferent refractive error

Correlations in amblyopic myopic eyes

There was a negative correlation between the magnitude of spherical error in myopic eyes and their visual acuity with P = 0.013; also, the depth of amblyopia increases with younger age with P = 0.831, and it was the worst in comparison to other refractive errors. [Table 3], and [Figure 1].{Table 3}{Figure 1}

Correlations in amblyopic hypermetropic eyes:

The same with hypermetropia was that the spherical error is statistically correlated with visual acuity (depth of amblyopia) with P = 0.032 and rho = −0.300 [Table 4], in a negative relation [Figure 2].{Table 4}{Figure 2}

Correlation of amblyopic eyes with astigmatism

In astigmatism, the relation of the cylindrical power difference with visual acuity was strongly significant statistically, with P = 0.015 and rho = −0.383 [Table 5], and [Figure 3].{Table 5}{Figure 3}

In contrast to this, the cylindrical error difference between eyes decreases with age (P = 0.06 and rho = 0.714). The visual acuity, if not treated, becomes worse, as the patient's age increases P = 0.900 rho = 0.020.

In hypermetropia and myopia, the situation is the same regarding the spherical equivalent difference between the amblyopic and healthy eyes, as the age increases, the difference decreases (P = 0.29, r = 0.22 for hyperopia) and (P = 0.57, r = 0.235 for myopia).

In contrast with age, the spherical equivalent difference and vision had an inverse relation with each other (P = 0.017, r = −0.285 for hyperopia) and (P = 0.061, r = −0.685 for myopia).

 Discussion



In our study, the number of females with anisometropic amblyopia was slightly higher, as observed in studies by Park et al. and Chua and Mitchell. Contrary to our findings, males were higher in other studies, such as Lee et al.[14],[15],[16]

Younger children with anisometropia were found to have lower prevalence and depth of amblyopia in comparison to older children with P = 0.035, which are the same conclusion by Donahue et al.[17]

There is no statistically significant difference between the right and left eye. Other studies found different side predominance, mostly on the left eye which had more amblyopia;[18],[19] however, there is no good and solid evidence regarding this variation in the laterality of the amblyopia in the literature.

The most important factors in determining the depth of anisometropic amblyopia were thought to be the magnitude of anisometropia, the spherical equivalent of the refractive error of 3.5 D or more, or anisometropia of 1.0 D or more was risk factors for developing amblyopia, according to Latvala et al.[20]

Kutschke et al. found that patients with anisometropia of myopia and astigmatism and mixed astigmatism had poorer visual outcomes, which is similar to our findings.[21]

The depth of amblyopia increases with increased age observed in our study was also observed by Donahue et al. A trend for increasing anisometropia with age is also supported by the studies of Bourne et al.[22] This was also observed in our study with P > 0.05 rho = 0.205.

Furthermore, a meta-analysis by Weale demonstrates that the prevalence of anisometropia in patients without amblyopia increases linearly with age.[23]

Our results in hypermetropia showed that the spherical powers of the amblyopic eyes were more strongly correlated with visual acuities than the differences of the spherical powers between amblyopic and healthy eyes (rho: 0.0300; rho: 0.274; P = 0.032), whereas in myopia, the differences of spherical powers between healthy and amblyopic eyes were more strongly correlated with log MAR visual acuities of the amblyopic eyes compared to spherical powers and spherical equivalents of the amblyopic myopic eyes, respectively (rho: 0.817; rho: 0.623; P = 0.013). In astigmatism, cylindrical power of the amblyopic eye and the difference of cylindrical powers between eyes was more strongly correlated with log MAR visual acuities of the amblyopic eyes than the spherical equivalents and difference of spherical equivalents between eyes in astigmatic amblyopic eyes, respectively (rho: 0.383; P = 0.015).

 Conclusions



There are no associations between eye's laterality or the gender with the depth of the anisometropic amblyopia found.

The age of the patient had a direct relation with the depth of amblyopia.

Thus, the smallest amount of anisometropia mainly astigmatism had a strong effect on the depth of amblyopia.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

[INLINE:1]

References

1Von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Binocular vision and ocular motility. In: Theory and Management of Strabismus. 6th ed., CV Mosby, St. Louis; 2001. p. 246 7.
2Levi DM. Progress and paradigm shifts in spatial vision over the 20 years of ECVP. Perception 1999;28:1443-59.
3Attebo K, Mitchell P, Cumming R, Smith W, Jolly N, Sparkes R. Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population. Ophthalmology 1998;105:154-9.
4Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, Irwin M, Jones HS, Auld RJ. Effectiveness of occlusion therapy in ametropic amblyopia: A pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:956-61.
5Sjostrand J, Abrahamsson M. Prevention of amblyopia and the concept of cure. Eur J Ophthalmo 1997;l7:121-9.
6Lai XJ, Alexander J, He M, Yang Z, Suttle C. Visual functions and interocular interactions in anisometropic children with and without amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:6849-59.
7Kiorpes L. Visual processing in amblyopia: Animal studies. Strabismus 2006;14:3-10.
8Kiorpes L, McKee SP. Neural mechanisms underlying amblyopia. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1999;9:480-6.
9Kiorpes L, Kiper DC, O'Keefe LP, Cavanaugh JR, Movshon JA. Neuronal correlates of amblyopia in the visual cortex of macaque monkeys with experimental strabismus and anisometropia. J Neurosci. 1998;18:6411-24.
10Friedman DS, Repka MX, Katz J, Giordano L, Ibironke J, Hawse P, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in white and African American children aged 6 through 71 months the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2128-340.
11Pai AS, Rose KA, Leone JF, Sharbini S, Burlutsky G, Varma R, et al. Amblyopia prevalence and risk factors in Australian preschool children. Ophthalmology 2012;119:138-44.
12Pokharel A, Pokharel PK, Das H, Adhikari S. The patternsof refractive errors among the schoolchildren of rural and urban settings in Nepal. Nep J Oph 2010;2:114-20.
13Williams C. (2009). Amblyopia. BMJ clinical evidence, 2009, 0709.
14Park KA, Park DY, Oh SY. Analysis of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography measurements in amblyopia: A pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:1700-6.
15Chua B, Mitchell P. Consequences of amblyopia on education, occupation, and long term vision loss. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1119-21.
16Lee CE, Lee YC, Lee SY. Factors influencing the prevalence of amblyopia in children with anisometropia. Korean J Ophthalmol 2010;24:225-9.
17Donahue SP, Arnold RW, Ruben JB; AAPOS Vision Screening Committee. Preschool vision screening: what should we be detecting and how should we report it? Uniform guidelines for reporting results of preschool vision screening studies. J AAPOS 2003;7:314-6.
18Woodruff G, Hiscox F, Thompson JR, Smith LK. The presentation of children with amblyopia. Eye (Lond) 1994;8 (Pt 6):623-6.
19Repka M, Simons K, Kraker R; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Laterality of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:270-4.
20Latvala ML, Paloheimo M, Karma A. Screening of amblyopic children and long-term follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:488-92.
21Kutschke PJ, Scott WE, Keech RV. Anisometropic amblyopia. Ophthalmology 1991;98:258-63.
22Bourne RR, Dineen BP, Ali SM, Noorul Huq DM, Johnson GJ. Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults: Results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of Bangladesh. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1150-60.
23Weale RA. On the age-related prevalence of anisometropia. Ophthalmic Res 2002;34:389-92.