|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 49-53
The effects of preoperative pregabalin administration on postoperative pain on Libyan patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Munira Ali Elmansouri1, Aisha Mohamed Dugani2, Salah Ahmed Adala1
1 Department of Surgery, Tripoli Central Hospital, Tripoli, Libya
2 Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya
|Date of Submission||20-Apr-2018|
|Date of Acceptance||08-Aug-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||22-Oct-2018|
Dr. Aisha Mohamed Dugani
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Tripoli, Tripoli
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Objective: The present prospective study was carried out in Surgical Department of Tripoli Central Hospital with the aim to evaluate the effect of preoperative single dose of 150 mg pregabalin in reducing postoperative pain and analgesic consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients of both sexes in the age of 18–60 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two equal groups of 30 patients each. The pregabalin group received 150 mg oral pregabalin 1 h before induction of anesthesia and a placebo group received a matching placebo orally. Variables measured included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), duration of surgery, time to first dose and total dose of meperidine after recovery, and the visual analog scale (VAS – static and dynamic). The occurrence of nausea and vomiting during the first 24 h postoperative was also recorded. Results: No significant difference was found between the meperidine and the placebo groups regarding age, sex, BMI, or duration of surgery. The time of first meperidine dose required to alleviate pain after surgery was significantly four times longer in the pregabalin group as compared to the placebo group. The total dose of meperidine required for pregabalin group was significantly lower than that required for placebo group. Moreover, VAS was significantly decreased in the pregabalin group compared to placebo group both at static and dynamic states only 1 h after recovery. Conclusion: This study validates the preoperative use of a single dose of pregabalin in attenuating pain intensity postoperatively and reducing total analgesic consumption.
Keywords: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, placebo, postoperative pain, pregabalin
|How to cite this article:|
Elmansouri MA, Dugani AM, Adala SA. The effects of preoperative pregabalin administration on postoperative pain on Libyan patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Libyan Int Med Univ J 2018;3:49-53
|How to cite this URL:|
Elmansouri MA, Dugani AM, Adala SA. The effects of preoperative pregabalin administration on postoperative pain on Libyan patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Libyan Int Med Univ J [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Jan 28];3:49-53. Available from: https://journal.limu.edu.ly/text.asp?2018/3/2/49/243750
| Introduction|| |
Early postoperative pain is the most common complaint after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It is also the most common cause of delayed discharge after the procedure., Although it is generally less intense than after open cholecystectomy, it could be agonizing and viewed to be the cause of preventable distress., The intensity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain usually peaks few hours after surgery and then declines over the following 2–3 days.
Postoperative pain relief following laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains controversial. Yet, being of multifactorial nature, a multimodal therapeutic approach may be necessary to optimize its relief., Appropriate timing for the initiation of treatment could be started postoperatively, intraoperatively (with or without the use of adjuvant maneuvers), or even preoperatively in conjunction to postoperatively (preemptive analgesia).
Pharmacotherapeutic management of postoperative pain could be achieved using opioids either alone or in conjunction with nonopioid analgesics or other pain controllers. Opioids usefulness is limited by side effects such as somnolence, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and respiratory depression. Nonopioids are safer but not all are as effective in control of visceral component of pain and usually are used in combination to others.,, Other pain control therapies such as antiepileptics (as gabapentinoids) local anesthetics (as bupivacaine), N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists (as ketamine), and α2-adrenergic agonist (as ziconotide) have all been assessed alone or in conjunction to analgesics.,
Other methods of administration have been reported by others including parenteral, intra/retroperitonal or a combination of both.,,,
Pregabalin and its developmental predecessor gabapentin are structural derivatives of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid, their anticonvulsant, anxiolytic, and sleep-modulating utility permitted their use as adjuncts for the management of generalized or partial epileptic seizures resistant to conventional therapies. Their therapeutic use was furthermore expanded over time to control chronic pain conditions (diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, central neuropathic pain, and fibromyalgia) as well as some acute pain conditions (inflammatory or incisional injuries [especially laparoscopic and day-care surgeries]).,,
Therefore, this study was aimed to evaluate the effect of oral administration of a preoperative single dose of pregabalin on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption in Libyan patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
| Patients and Methods|| |
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Tripoli Central Hospital on August 2014. Patients who met the inclusion criteria and assessed for eligibility from September 2014 to March 2015 received a detailed information about the study, and a written informed consent was given by each.
Patients with uncontrolled medical disease (hypertension and diabetes mellitus), a history of drug or alcohol abuse, problems in the kidney or liver functions, and a history of intake of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 24 h before surgery were excluded from the study.
Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups (30 patients each) using the double-blind technique. Pregabalin group received 150 mg of pregabalin-containing capsules orally (Lyrica®, Pfizer), while a matching placebo group received an empty capsule filled with starch orally 1 h before the induction of anesthesia with sips of water. Treatment is done under double-blind techniques.
Visual analog scale (VAS) is an international classification measure used for the assessment of acute pain intensity after surgery. Pain is classified into mild (1–3): patients feel pain and discomfort but can complete most activities; moderate (4–6): pain makes patient difficult to concentrate and may interfere with his normal activities; and severe (7–10): intense pain, patient limits physical activity and cannot concentrate on anything else except the pain. Patients were instructed in the day before operation how to use the VAS. Postoperative pain assessment was recorded at rest (static) and during coughing (dynamic).
Assessment of pain began in the recovery room (0 h) and then 1, 2, and 3 h after the arrival of patient to the ward. Accordingly, patients received 1 mg/kg intramuscular meperidine whenever postoperative pain (static or dynamic) as measured by VAS ≥4. The time needed for the initiation of the first dose of meperidine during the postoperative period and the total administered doses of meperidine required to prevent pain score from exceeding VAS ≥4 throughout the 3 h period were calculated.
Patients were observed for any nausea and vomiting during the first three postoperative hours.
SPSS software package version 16 was used for the statistical analysis of the data. Chi-square test was used for comparison between quantitative data and Mann–Whitney test was used for qualitative data. A difference was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05. Results are presented as a mean ± standard error of the mean.
| Results|| |
There were no significant differences between the pregabalin and placebo groups in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), or mean duration of surgery [Table 1].
The assessment of intraoperative meperidine consumption (dose given during the induction of anesthesia) showed that there were no significant differences between the pregabalin and placebo groups [Table 2]. On the other hand, the time of first meperidine dose required to alleviate pain after surgery was significantly longer in the pregabalin group as compared to the placebo group [Table 2]. Moreover, the total dose of meperidine required for pregabalin group was significantly lower than that required for the placebo group [Table 2].
|Table 2: A comparison of first analgesic requirement times since patient's recovery and total analgesic consumption during 24 h|
Click here to view
VAS was significantly decreased in the pregabalin group compared to placebo group both at static and dynamic states at time (0) when patients were in the recovery room [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. The value of VAS score remained significantly lower in the pregabalin groups as compared to the placebo groups in the 1st h following the operation. However, at the 2nd and 3rd h after surgery, the difference between pregabalin and placebo groups was insignificant [Figure 1] and [Figure 2].
|Figure 1: Distribution of visual analog scale (Static) in patients of pregabalin and placebo groups during the follow-up after the operation. Data are expressed as a mean ± standard error of the mean, **P < 0.005 using Mann–Whitney test|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Distribution of visual analog scale (Dynamic) in patients of pregabalin and placebo groups during the follow-up after the operation. Data are expressed as a mean ± standard error of the mean, **P < 0.005 using Mann–Whitney test|
Click here to view
Nausea occurred in eight people (26.7%) and vomiting in one (3.3%) of the placebo group. In the pregabalin group, only three patients (10%) had nausea, and no one suffered a vomiting episode. No statistically significant differences were noted between the two groups [Table 3].
| Discussion|| |
Pain is one of the primary concerns of the surgeon because of its close ties with clinical outcome and acute postoperative patient well-being. The role of pregabalin in controlling acute pain, especially acute postoperative pain, was assessed in several randomized controlled trials of surgeries performed under general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, or day-care surgery in doses varying from 50 to 600 mg/day. Within those aforementioned surgeries, some approved and others denied pregabalin utility in controlling acute postoperative pain evoked by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. When contrasting between those reports, the doses of pregabalin used, the quality of pain assessed, the methodology by which pain was scored, the type of rescue analgesic added, and the conclusion that was drawn were all different.,,,
Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the preemptive analgesic properties of pregabalin on acute postoperative pain, and how this drug can modify meperidine consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
In this study, the patients were observed for 24 h after recovery; however, patient self-assessment of pain intensity was done only for 3 h after recovery from surgery. The results of the present work showed no differences among the studied groups regarding age, sex, BMI, and duration of surgery, which indicates the homogeneity between the two groups.
Single-dose pregabalin was effective in prolonging the timing of first meperidine dose and reducing the total dose of meperidine given during 24 h after recovery. On the other hand, the reduction of postoperative pain as reported by the patients in VAS was significant only 1 h after recovery. The results regarding VAS measures were not in agreement with those reported by Agarwal et al., who using the same dose of pregabalin, reported a significant reduction in postoperative pain intensity till the end of 24th h; this could be attributed to race difference in pain perception among patients of the two studies. However, we have to point out that pregabalin half-life time is estimated to be around 6 h. A meta-analysis has shown that the dose and number of doses of pregabalin can affect pain scores following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, where, for example, a significant reduction in pain intensity with lower pain scores was observed at rest in the pregabalin 75 mg group in the first 90 min after surgery; while in the pregabalin 50 mg group, the reduction in pain intensity was more transient and lasted for 45 min compared to placebo group. The perioperative administration of pregabalin was reported to reduce the consumption of opioids in other surgeries such as gynecological laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and transperitoneal nephrectomy. The pretreatment with pregabalin in this study has resulted in no increase in nausea and vomiting after recovery from surgery.
| Conclusion|| |
This study has confirmed that oral administration of a preoperative single dose of 150 mg pregabalin has resulted in lower postoperative pain and meperidine consumption in Libyan patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H. Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain 2001;90:261-9.
Elhakim M, Amine H, Kamel S, Saad F. Effects of intraperitoneal lidocaine combined with intravenous or intraperitoneal tenoxicam on pain relief and bowel recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:929-33.
Ure BM, Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Dietrich A, Lefering R, Neugebauer E, et al.
Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intensity and localization of pain and analysis of predictors in preoperative symptoms and intraoperative events. Surg Endosc 1994;8:90-6.
Davis MP. Recent advances in the treatment of pain. F1000 Med Rep 2010;2:63.
Karaaslan D, Sivaci RG, Akbulut G, Dilek ON. Preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled study. Pain Pract 2006;6:237-41.
Johnson RC, Hedges AR, Morris R, Stamatakis JD. Ideal pain relief following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Clin Pract 1999;53:16-8.
Widdison AL. A systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996;78:476.
Slanetz PJ, Boland GW, Mueller PR. Imaging and interventional radiology in laparoscopic injuries to the gallbladder and biliary system. Radiology 1996;201:595-603.
Michaloliakou C, Chung F, Sharma S. Preoperative multimodal analgesia facilitates recovery after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1996;82:44-51.
Sandhu T, Paiboonworachat S, Ko-Iam W. Effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2011;25:23-7.
Ott DE, Reich H, Love B, McCorvey R, Toledo A, Liu CY, et al.
Reduction of laparoscopic-induced hypothermia, postoperative pain and recovery room length of stay by pre-conditioning gas with the insuflow device: A prospective randomized controlled multi-center study. JSLS 1998;2:321-9.
Thurley PD, Dhingsa R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Postoperative imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:794-801.
Shneker BF, McAuley JW. Pregabalin: A new neuromodulator with broad therapeutic indications. Ann Pharmacother 2005;39:2029-37.
Houghton AK, Lu Y, Westlund KN. S-(+)-3-isobutylgaba and its stereoisomer reduces the amount of inflammation and hyperalgesia in an acute arthritis model in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1998;285:533-8.
Moore RA, Straube S, Wiffen PJ, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Pregabalin for acute and chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(3):CD007076.
Baidya DK, Agarwal A, Khanna P, Arora MK. Pregabalin in acute and chronic pain. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:307-14.
] [Full text]
Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Breivik EK, et al
. Assessment of pain. BJA 2008;101:17-24.
Roth T, van Seventer R, Murphy TK. The effect of pregabalin on pain-related sleep interference in diabetic peripheral neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia: A review of nine clinical trials. Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26:2411-9.
Bockbrader H, Hunt T, Strand J, Posvar E, Sedman A. Pregabalin pharmacokinetics and safety in healthy volunteers: Results from two phase 1 studies. Neurology 2000;54:A421.
Breivik H. Postoperative pain management: Why is it difficult to show that it improves outcome? Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998;15:748-51.
Chang SH, Lee HW, Kim HK, Kim SH, Kim DK. An evaluation of perioperative pregabalin for prevention and attenuation of postoperative shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1284-6.
Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995;7:89-91.
Tan EC, Lim Y, Teo YY, Goh R, Law HY, Sia AT, et al.
Ethnic differences in pain perception and patient-controlled analgesia usage for postoperative pain. J Pain 2008;9:849-55.
Agarwal A, Gautam S, Gupta D, Agarwal S, Singh PK, Singh U, et al.
Evaluation of a single preoperative dose of pregabalin for attenuation of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:700-4.
Peng PW, Li C, Farcas E, Haley A, Wong W, Bender J, et al.
Use of low-dose pregabalin in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2010;105:155-61.
Jokela R, Ahonen J, Tallgren M, Haanpää M, Korttila K. A randomized controlled trial of perioperative administration of pregabalin for pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Pain 2008;134:106-12.
Cabrera Schulmeyer MC, de la Maza J, Ovalle C, Farias C, Vives I. Analgesic effects of a single preoperative dose of pregabalin after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2010;20:1678-81.
Bornemann-Cimenti H, Lederer AJ, Wejbora M, Michaeli K, Kern-Pirsch C, Archan S, et al.
Preoperative pregabalin administration significantly reduces postoperative opioid consumption and mechanical hyperalgesia after transperitoneal nephrectomy. Br J Anaesth 2012;108:845-9.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]